tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post113104924624668407..comments2023-08-10T21:14:14.933+12:00Comments on Insolent Prick: Spare A Thought For These Impoverished Pinkos...Insolent Prickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12438163323894858558noreply@blogger.comBlogger19125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1132186100358354312005-11-17T13:08:00.000+13:002005-11-17T13:08:00.000+13:00You're telling the story Kerre, in the past, a li...You're telling the story Kerre, in the past, a litlle implausibility and potnetial impossibility never stopped experimenting.<BR/>what method do you use to gargle mouthwash? Do you do it straight from the bottle, or take just a capful then do the bizzo?<BR/>Do think that the audience at this site are as gullible as the ones who tune in to your slot?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131961212960123582005-11-14T22:40:00.000+13:002005-11-14T22:40:00.000+13:00I actually don't want or need to be paid more - I ...I actually don't want or need to be paid more - I just didn't think people should have to pay to read my stuff - any more than the cover price of the newspaper - as befits an anti-capitalist and commie foamer. Oh and to the correspondent who was talking about gargling - please! Take one hand off your pud and the other off Penthouse letters - I don't believe it would be physically possible, would it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131409220698862912005-11-08T13:20:00.000+13:002005-11-08T13:20:00.000+13:00Um, probably the same as if she wasn't on telly. ...Um, probably the same as if she wasn't on telly. You know they are real people too. And, maybe, regardless of what you all think of Kerre what you are discussing here is in pretty poor taste, no?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131406833044836152005-11-08T12:40:00.000+13:002005-11-08T12:40:00.000+13:00fall call, shall I reword it...IF it were you who ...fall call, shall I reword it...IF it were you who had just witnessed a chick currently on the telly gargle, and the swallow your load, what would your opinion be of her and her party tricks?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131321186211174042005-11-07T12:53:00.000+13:002005-11-07T12:53:00.000+13:00sorry IP, no self facials, as it was protein feast...sorry IP, no self facials, as it was protein feast.<BR/>what would your interpretation of the facts be now IP and Cathy. (I understand you are 2 separate people, and so expect 2 answers)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131175608921018482005-11-05T20:26:00.000+13:002005-11-05T20:26:00.000+13:00You're right, they have sabotaged the new arrangem...You're right, they have sabotaged the new arrangements - & if I was the boss, I would probably terminate their contracts (which is what the Gang is asking for anyway).<BR/><BR/>My difference of opinion is with the mechanism adopted by Herald management to generate revenue. At the very least, these "premium content" items should be made available online to all current NZH print subscribers free-of-charge.<BR/><BR/>Your pay-per-view idea doesn't need www.nzherald.co.nz to make it fly - any individual or group can do as you suggest...the internet is a great way to generate wildfire word-of-mouth, so the only platform / barrier to success is content.<BR/><BR/>On the subject of Russell B, check out http://newzealandnow.info/article/commentator-russell-brown<BR/><BR/>In your opinion, is it appropriate for his partisan website to be promoted by a taxpayer-funded initiative? I don't understand why a link to PA.net was deemed acceptable.Abacus Equitieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07635137571462620206noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131169917598694992005-11-05T18:51:00.000+13:002005-11-05T18:51:00.000+13:00The fact is, Andy, the Gang of 14 have sabotaged t...The fact is, Andy, the Gang of 14 have sabotaged the Herald's premium content. People aren't going to subscribe to the premium content--which is mainly the columnists' pieces--if they believe either that the plan isn't going to proceed, or that it's basically unfair--which is what the columnists are saying.<BR/><BR/>That pinko commie Russell Brown misses the frigging point again. Of course, on introduction of a new premium service, there is going to be initial resistance. But it is hardly doing the Gang of 14 any favours by pointing out that they're not a drawing card for the premium service.<BR/><BR/>And nor should the Herald be looking at paying the columnists more until they're able to be a draw-card to the premium service.<BR/><BR/>The Herald management should fire all its current columnists, and enlist people that readers are actually prepared to pay to read. And then the Herald can pay them well.<BR/><BR/>Simple solution, really.Insolent Prickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12438163323894858558noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131160776659887662005-11-05T16:19:00.000+13:002005-11-05T16:19:00.000+13:00Refer IP's "facial" comment & take your pick.Getti...Refer IP's "facial" comment & take your pick.<BR/><BR/>Getting back to the real issue...I agree with IP; the so-called Gang of 14's negotiating tactics are nonsense, BUT I'm still pleased they've raised the "premium content" policy.<BR/><BR/>The Herald has miscalculated here, the current model is flawed. I'd be happy to debate their options with management.Abacus Equitieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07635137571462620206noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131147802191897282005-11-05T12:43:00.000+13:002005-11-05T12:43:00.000+13:00Both cheeks?Upper or lower???Both cheeks?<BR/><BR/>Upper or lower???Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02397480700716013852noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131143304087118522005-11-05T11:28:00.000+13:002005-11-05T11:28:00.000+13:00Guys...I think "anonymous" is pulling your chain.M...Guys...I think "anonymous" is pulling your chain.<BR/><BR/>Ms Woodham was a well-known Courtenay Place booze-hag, which possibly explains her retarded columns in the Herald.<BR/><BR/>As for this salacious gossip...I distinctly recall pecking both cheeks a couple of times, so perhaps a quick trip to the Listerine bottle is in order.Abacus Equitieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07635137571462620206noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131096052039099882005-11-04T22:20:00.000+13:002005-11-04T22:20:00.000+13:00Ffs, get a room already.Ffs, get a room already.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131094824398246722005-11-04T22:00:00.000+13:002005-11-04T22:00:00.000+13:00If she spat upwards, would she have given herself ...If she spat upwards, would she have given herself a full facial?Insolent Prickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12438163323894858558noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131091424102968372005-11-04T21:03:00.000+13:002005-11-04T21:03:00.000+13:00Have all of you fuckers missed the frigging POINT?...Have all of you fuckers missed the frigging POINT?<BR/><BR/>These clowns are independent contractors. They choose to be so because they do not wish to be bound to APN as a full-time Herald journalist.<BR/><BR/>What Russell Brown is attempting to do is unionise them. They want to completely change the relationship they have with the Herald; not satisfied with the sad choices they have made in life, they clearly want parity with full-time salaried employees.<BR/><BR/>They want all the benefits of salaried employment--including the right to negotiate agreements collectively. They're a bloody sham: a muddled bunch of socialists who have poor individual negotiating skills, have signed away copyright and decent money for their shitty opinions, and now want to hold the Herald to ransom.<BR/><BR/>Russell is stretching credibility when he says that the prime motivator is the columnists' desire to get feedback on their work. That is disingenuous hogwash.<BR/><BR/>It's unionism by stealth.Insolent Prickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12438163323894858558noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131079221815092102005-11-04T17:40:00.000+13:002005-11-04T17:40:00.000+13:00Ahh - from journalists' pay rates to the nitty gri...Ahh - from journalists' pay rates to the nitty gritty of oral sex in eight posts....Where else but on this blog?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02397480700716013852noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131076378968830842005-11-04T16:52:00.000+13:002005-11-04T16:52:00.000+13:00her best party trick was to gargle cumher best party trick was to gargle cumAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131075465337156102005-11-04T16:37:00.000+13:002005-11-04T16:37:00.000+13:00Kerre Woodham?Hmm, she had commercial pull once up...Kerre Woodham?<BR/><BR/>Hmm, she had commercial pull once upon a time...straddled on a barstool in Paradiso during the 90s. She had more interesting things to say back then too...<BR/><BR/>I like Colin James. His columns are available online at www.synapsis.co.nz - & I reckon he's worth a helluva lot more than Granny Herald will ever pay.Abacus Equitieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07635137571462620206noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131069903562576312005-11-04T15:05:00.000+13:002005-11-04T15:05:00.000+13:00Who can blame the feckless fourteen?Of course they...Who can blame the feckless fourteen?<BR/><BR/>Of course they're trying it on: it may well work. The prevailing view in this country is that people should get paid what they "deserve" rather than what they're worth. I.e. if you want to spend your whole time painting pictures with sheep droppings then someone's got to pay you for it.<BR/><BR/>Richard Littlejohn - now there's a columnist. He was the third best reason to buy The Sun (Lucy from Colchester of course being reasons one and two).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131066904665943552005-11-04T14:15:00.000+13:002005-11-04T14:15:00.000+13:00Maybe you and Cathy should marry?Maybe you and Cathy should marry?Rob Goodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03696059924886120946noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14039752.post-1131065788210508732005-11-04T13:56:00.000+13:002005-11-04T13:56:00.000+13:00The Bard now? You're arrogance is really quite am...The Bard now? You're arrogance is really quite amusing - its why I keep coming back.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com